Wenn diese Seite nicht korrekt angezeigt wird
gehen Sie bitte zur Originalseite



Palin latest to walk back criticism of GOP leader Limbaugh | Media Matters for America
About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Palin latest to walk back criticism of GOP leader Limbaugh

February 07, 2010 3:13 pm ET — 46 Comments

On Fox News Sunday, Sarah Palin became the latest Republican leader to walk back criticism of Rush Limbaugh's incendiary rhetoric, saying that he had been "satirical" in using the word "retards." In a prior statement about Limbaugh's comments, a Palin spokesperson had criticized the "crude and demeaning name-calling" of using the word, before later claiming that the statement was "not specifically aimed at Limbaugh" and, according to Limbaugh, calling his staffer "sort of in a panic" to explain it.

Palin says Limbaugh meant to be "satirical" in using word "retards"

From the February 7 edition of Fox Broadcsting Co.'s Fox News Sunday:

CHRIS WALLACE (host): OK, but, Rush Limbaugh weighed in this week, and he said this: "Our politically correct society is acting like some giant insult's taken place by calling a bunch of people who are retards, retards."

PALIN: He was satirical in that --

WALLACE: Wait, let me finish. "I mean, these people, these liberal activists are kooks." Should Rush Limbaugh apologize?

PALIN: They are kooks, so I agree with Rush Limbaugh. Rush Limbaugh was using satire to bring attention to what this politically correct --

WALLACE: But he used the "R" word.

PALIN: Using satire. Name-calling by anyone -- I teach this to my children. You teach this to your children and your grandchildren, too. Name-calling by anyone, it's just unnecessary. It just wastes time. Let's speak to the issues and again, let's move on.

WALLACE: But you know what some people are going to say, Governor, and have said. They say, look, when it's their political adversary, Rahm Emanuel, she's going to call him out -- he's indecent, apologize. But when it's a political friend like Rush Limbaugh, oh, it's satire.

PALIN: I didn't hear Rush Limbaugh call a group of people whom he did not agree with "f-ing retards," and we did know that Rahm Emanuel, it's been reported, did say that. There's a big difference there.

Palin spox originally criticized Limbaugh, calling his comments "crude and demeaning"

Responding to Palin-Emanuel controversy, Limbaugh says liberals who complained about health care reform "are retards." On the February 3 edition of his nationally syndicated radio show, Limbaugh said: "There's Rahm Emanuel out there, who is in big trouble for calling liberals -- for calling liberal activists 'f-ing retards.' Sarah Palin demanded that he be fired. Instead he has apologized to liberal activists. He was getting mad at them about health care. ... So now, I think the big news is, the crack-up going on -- but our political correct society is acting like some giant insult has taken place by calling a bunch of people who are retards "retards." I mean, these people, these liberal activists are kooks. They are loony-toons. I'm not going to apologize for it, I'm just quoting Emanuel. It's in the news."  [The Rush Limbaugh Show02/03/10]

Limbaugh also assured listeners Palin would not denounce his comments. On his February 4 show, Limbaugh addressed his use of the word "retard," saying Palin "knows that I do this kind of -- Sarah Palin is a lifelong listener of this program. ... [T]hey're trying to goad her into denouncing me like they did Emanuel, but she knows that all I'm doing is quoting Emanuel and highlighting that it's these people who say this kind of stuff." [The Rush Limbaugh Show02/04/10]

Palin spokesperson responded to Limbaugh, saying his words amount to "crude and demeaning name calling." After Limbaugh's February 4 comments, the Washington Post Co.'s Greg Sargent posted a comment he received from Palin spokesperson Meghan Stapleton in response to Limbaugh's words. Stapleton said: "Governor Palin believes crude and demeaning name calling at the expense of others is disrespectful."

Stapleton told Politico she was not singling out Limbaugh. A February 5 Politico article reported that Stapleton "told POLITICO that the comment given to The Plum Line was not specifically aimed at Limbaugh." The article quoted her as saying, "The Washington Post is trying hard to take the pressure off the White House by creating a side controversy, but it is missing the point. ... As the governor has said, it doesn't matter who says the 'r' word. It should no longer be part of our lexicon."

Limbaugh says Stapleton called "sort of in a panic" to explain. On his February 5 show, Limbaugh said Stapleton called his chief of staff "sort of in a panic" over the Politico article saying, "I didn't mention Rush in particular. They kept asking me about Rush, and I kept answering generically. But they kept asking me about Rush, and I just wanted you to know."  Limbaugh said he believed Stapleton over Politico, "no question about it." [The Rush Limbaugh Show02/05/10]

Sargent posts email showing he received Stapleton remark in response to question about Limbaugh. Following the publication of the Politico article, Sargent posted on his blog the "email I sent to Palin spokesperson Meghan Stapleton," which reads, "[Former Palin spokesperson] Jason Recher said...you'd be reaching out to me about Rush's use of the term 'retarded.'" Sargent added: "I subsequently emailed her to be absolutely certain that it applied to Rush. She didn't dispute this, answering that it applies to "anyone" who uses the term."

Palin's comment echoes Limbaugh's own explanation of his remark

Limbaugh: Remark was "satire, S-A-T-I-R-E." On the February 5 edition of his show -- after saying Stapleton had called "sort of in a panic" -- Limbaugh stated that he used the word "retards" as "satire," and that he used it "to wash their mouths [Harry Reid's and Emanuel's] out with soap and made an uncomfortable point." From the show:

Are you comfortable with the words, or with Harry Reid and Rahm Emanuel? I'm uncomfortable with the men and the manner in which they use these words. Words don't generally offend me. I try not to give people the power to offend me, but Harry Reid and Rahm Emanuel -- they do offend me, and they scare me, and they worry me. These men have cold hearts. They are statists. They have power over all of us. They are trying desperately to exercise that power.

In fact, my friends, I am so uncomfortable with these men I purposely chose to use a rhetorical tool -- satire, S-A-T-I-R-E -- to ridicule and humiliate them. That tool is an effective blunt object in breaking through walls put up by state controlled media to protect Democrats. Satire. For those of you in Rio Linda, here's the definition: the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule or the like in exposing, denouncing or deriding vice, folly, etcetera.

I used Harry Reid's words and Rahm Emanuel's words -- not mine -- to expose and punish their behavior. I used satire to wash their mouths out with soap and made an uncomfortable point because the state controlled media would have run any Republican out of office, as in George Allen and macaca, if they had been caught saying what Reid and Emanuel said. Just as they're trying to run me off the radio for repeating what they said.

Many other Republicans have walked back their criticism of Limbaugh

Michael Steele walked back comment that Limbaugh is an "entertainer" and his show is "incendiary" and "ugly." On the February 28, 2009 edition of CNN's D.L.Hughley Breaks the News, Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele responded to Limbaugh's comment that he wanted Obama to "fail," by saying: "Rush Limbaugh is an entertainer. Rush Limbaugh, his whole thing is entertainment. Yes, he has this incendiary--yes, it's ugly." He later reportedly apologized to Limbaugh, telling Politico: "My intent was not to go after Rush -- I have enormous respect for Rush Limbaugh. ... I was maybe a little bit inarticulate. ... There was no attempt on my part to diminish his voice or his leadership."  

Rep. Gingrey apologized after saying it's "easy" for Limbaugh to "stand back and throw bricks." After Limbaugh said on his show that Obama is "more frightened of me," than other Republican leaders, and that it "doesn't say much about our party," Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA) reportedly said that "it's easy if you're Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh or even sometimes Newt Gingrich to stand back and throw bricks. You don't have to try to do what's best for your people and your party. You know you're just on these talk shows and you're living well and plus you stir up a bit of controversy and gin the base and that sort of thing." Gingrey later apologized, saying he sees "eye to eye" with Limbaugh, that he and other conservative radio hosts "are the voices of the conservative movement's conscience," and that "we are inspired by their words and by their determination."

Gov. Sanford backpedaled comment that "anyone who wants Obama to fail is an idiot." In a February 25, 2009 interview with Real Clear Politics, South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford said of Obama: "I don't want him to fail. Anybody who wants him to fail is an idiot, because it means we're all in trouble." According to a Think Progress post, Sanford's spokesperson later said "the governor was not referring to anyone" and was speaking "generically."

Rep. Tiahrt hedges after saying Limbaugh is "just an entertainer." During an April 2009 interview with the Kansas City Star, Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-KS) reportedly said Limbaugh is "just an entertainer," after being asked "by a Kansas City Star Editorial Board member whether Limbaugh was now the de facto leader of the GOP."  The Wichita Eagle later reported: "Tiahrt spokesman Sam Sackett said Tiahrt was not speaking negatively about Limbaugh but was trying to defend him against the suggestion that Limbaugh could be blamed for the GOP's woes. 'The congressman believes Rush is a great leader of the conservative movement in America -- not a party leader responsible for election losses,' Sackett told The Eagle editorial board. 'Nothing the congressman said diminished the role Rush has played and continues to play in the conservative movement.' "

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (February 07, 2010 3:20 pm ET)
      14 2
      Short version--it's all right for a right-wing fanatic to insult her son in front of his reputed 20-million-strong audience, while a Democrat using a similar term in a closed-door meeting must be fired for it. Yep. Got it. Check...

      True version--Sarah Palin is a soulless vampire who would literally roast her son alive if it would score her political points. Her children mean literally nothing to her more than political props she can trot out whenever she wants to attack her opponents. Where are Child Protective Services when you need them?...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by LJane (February 08, 2010 2:31 pm ET)
          3
        Short version - it's all right for a member of the current administration to use the term "F*n retard", like a 5th grader (and not MY 5th grader, mind you).

        Long version - it's not ok for Rush Limbaugh to make fun of such a use by Rahm.

        True version - Media Matters should find a time Rush used the term "f*n retard" prior to commenting on Rahm's use of the word.

        After all, they're all about truth an accuracy, no?

        Sarah's children are not political props. They are just her children.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NewBee (February 08, 2010 6:35 pm ET)
          2  
          Emmanuel used the term behind closed doors, privately. Limbaugh said it repeatedly on the public airwaves. The idea that Limbaugh used it in order to "make fun of Emmanuel" is pure, unadulterated spin and nothing else.

          Sarah's children are not political props
          Of course not. She's no longer running for office. She quit the last political job she had.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (February 09, 2010 1:10 am ET)
             
          They WERE political props when she was in political office and running for VP!!!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Dradeeus (February 07, 2010 3:21 pm ET)
      13 1
      Again, he called Emanuel's apology tour to Special Olympics and other special-needs interests the "Retard Summit". That's not satirical, he wasn't calling liberals retards, he was calling liberals AND autistic people retards.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (February 07, 2010 3:23 pm ET)
      11 1
      Satirical use of the term is wrong too.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by achrispage6992 (February 08, 2010 8:03 am ET)
          5
        Delldolly,

        Although I have distinct differences with you on a variety of subjects, I cannot agree with you more on this. The term is degrading whether it be satirical or not. I made this argument some time ago (although it involved "satire" where a persons intelligence was equated with someone who "wears a bicycle helmet and has a helper") and I was lampooned by many as being silly, too sensitive, blah, blah, blah. I do find it interesting how so many here now seem to disdain colorful satire about the intellectually disabled. I guess all it takes is for a raving lunatic conservative to say these things, because when a liberal does it here, it's not that big of a deal.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NewBee (February 08, 2010 6:37 pm ET)
          1  
          I would never call a conservative the "R Word" because it would be an insult to those mentally challenged people. There are different levels of mental challenge and certainly they should be drug down to the conservative level.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NewBee (February 08, 2010 6:39 pm ET)
            1  
            There are different levels of mental challenge and certainly they should be drug down to the conservative level.
            Make that "..should not be drug down..".
            Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (February 09, 2010 1:35 am ET)
             
          I found the previous incident here, and someone DID make a rude joke about Bill O'Reilly, saying that O'Reilly is so stupid that he needed a "bike helmet and have a personal caretaker". I disagree that it was "satire". It was a joke that was in bad taste. Satire and jokes are not always the same - maybe you need to read up on that subject.

          Rahm meant no offense to mentally disadvantaged people, but it was still not something he should have said, even in private, even in anger. And he apologized for it.

          The previous poster meant NO offense to mentally disadvantaged people either with his joke about O'Reilly. He meant offense to O'Reilly! He still shouldn't have said it. Had I been posting back then, I would have chided that poster for that comment had I seen it.

          But even back then, you weren't seen as being sincere in your objections. You got a bunch of thumbs down because not only did you not make good points about the inappropriate comment, but you failed in that post to condemn the ignorant comment that O'Reilly made that led that poster to make the inappropriate comment.

          And then you continued to prove them right. As I already said, neither Rahm or the poster last summer was making fun or making light of mentally disabled individuals. O'Reilly was the target. This got explained to you and you refused to acknowledge that.

          You put up multiple strawmen arguments, and even after they'd get knocked down, you'd throw them back up again.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Think4yourself (February 07, 2010 3:29 pm ET)
        2
      Rahm Emmanual is far worse than Rush Limbaugh with regards to tact and decency. Neither are poster children for the American People. Covering this portion of the interview is pointless.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by NewBee (February 08, 2010 6:39 pm ET)
        1  
        Rahm Emmanual is far worse than Rush Limbaugh with regards to tact and decency.
        Riiighht.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dogbreath (February 07, 2010 3:38 pm ET)
      2  
      She mentions how she teaches her children not to call people names and then immediately agrees with Wallace that "liberal activitist," aka people who disagree with the right-wing agenda, kooks. I have a name for Sarah. Hypocrite. I only call them as I see them.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by For.America.2600 (February 07, 2010 3:56 pm ET)
      11  
      If you want satire, watch the Colbert Report.

      Spouting pejoratives behind the guise of a satire is a cop-out.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SFnomad (February 07, 2010 4:47 pm ET)
        9  
        Republicans can't do satire ... they've all had humorectomies.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (February 07, 2010 11:01 pm ET)
            6
          I think it was Lenin who called people like edrossinoelwein9669 'ignorant freakin' A-holes'.

          That's satire, according to the wags here at MMFA. If you put three of them together, you'd have a halfwit!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NewBee (February 08, 2010 6:40 pm ET)
            1  
            That's satire, according to the wags here at MMFA. If you put three of them together, you'd have a halfwit!
            What are you talking about?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (February 07, 2010 4:30 pm ET)
      9  
      Language is not an area known to any of the clones at Fox unless it is to speak to their neanderthal followers. Getting upset over anything they say is like criticizing a dog for eating his own feces. LANGUAGE? What "language" is Palin speaking? It isn't English, that's for sure. Only her worshipers can "understand" her and swallow her every uneducated utterance. Limbaugh CAN put three words together, but to the same end. He is NOT stupid, just bat-s**t C-R-A-Z-Y! (Our resident right-winger will say I just can't tolerate a "different opinion". Saying that health=care for all is Soviet-style socialism is not an opinion. It is a mistaken and crazy statement, not an opinion. To say the sun is made of cotton candy is not an opinion. It is "wrong".)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (February 07, 2010 4:51 pm ET)
      1 19
      Maybe the truth is that the people MMFA cites really did recognize Rush's use of satire (a capability beyond the humor-challenged among us - like liberals and progressives).
      Surely in the vast recesses of our nannyocracy there is a program for social ret... oh, I mean socially challenged people like Rahm Emanuel. Something like 'anger-management' classes? After all, we have obedience classes for pit bulls - surely there is something that could be done for that poor soul Rahm? (No offense meant toward pit bulls.)
      The ignorant, condescending arrogance of the left (like Emanuel and Obama) would be political suicide if we had a press that wasn't lap-dog subservient to its leftist masters.
      I think it was Lenin who called people like the MSM and MMFA 'useful idiots.'
      Report Abuse
      • Author by FGFM (February 07, 2010 4:56 pm ET)
        8 1
        Limbaugh's a thug.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by For.America.2600 (February 07, 2010 5:24 pm ET)
        6  
        If you listen to Rushs' show you can tell what parts are his satirical bits and what aren't. The songs they make up and play would be satire, this topic of discussion doesn't count.

        Have you never been presented with an idea so outlandish or have had someone say something so completely false to you that it would incite such a response on par with Rahm said? Where the first response you said was just reflexionary?

        The dig against the politically correct society in this case is the actual use of the word "retarded." It has evolved from just the insult to compare someone to a mentally challenged person to represent an idea or action that is completely incomprehensible. When people use that word to describe a silly idea, the comparison to a handicapped person just doesn't show up in that thought process. Thats just how the use of that word has evolved, by adding an "-ed" at the end changed the connotation.




        Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (February 07, 2010 5:26 pm ET)
        11  
        You missed the point and changed to subject. Nice work!

        Does Rahm seem to have anger issues? Maybe.

        Is that what Palin is calling for him to be fired over? Hardly.

        She put out a blanket statement that calling people retards is wrong.

        Except for when Rush Limbaugh does it because he's using satire.

        So using this logic, if Rush calls Obama a "n*igger", that would be OK too, if it is satire and Sarah Palin agrees, am I right?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by sambo (February 07, 2010 6:12 pm ET)
        7  
        After reading your post, you might need to be careful using words like ignorant, and idiots
        Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (February 07, 2010 8:19 pm ET)
        6  
        Well, you hit all of the wingnut talking points. But you still haven't explained how this is satire.

        >>So now, I think the big news is, the crack-up going on -- but our political correct society is acting like some giant insult has taken place by calling a bunch of people who are retards "retards."
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mescal (February 07, 2010 8:39 pm ET)
        3  
        I think it was Lenin who called people like edrossinoelwein9669 'ignorant freakin' A-holes'.

        Now, see, THAT was an example of satire, eddiebaby.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (February 07, 2010 10:27 pm ET)
            7
          No, that was stupidity on parade.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (February 07, 2010 11:19 pm ET)
            6  
            I think it was Lenin who called people like the MSM and MMFA 'useful idiots.'

            Sorry, chump, but mescal took your words and made fun of them--classic satrie. But you, like Thin-Skinned Sarah, have a hissy fit when your words are used against you. And then--most precious of all--you claim that we're the ones with no sense of humor. So frankly, edrossindeliriumtremens, the only stupidity on parade here is yours...
            Report Abuse
      • Author by RKAllen (February 07, 2010 9:38 pm ET)
        8  
        Obviously, the irony is completely lost to you.

        Sarah Palin, in response to Rahm Emanuel's insensitive remark was, use of the word is a...
        "slur on all God's children with cognitive and development disabilities – and the people who love them.
        Translation... use of the word "retarded" or any form of it is an insult to her child and "all God's children" who suffer in this manner. There is no ambiguity to a statement like this. No grey area to retreat to if you offend. Use of the word is wrong in all its forms, according to her statement.

        She saw blood in the water, knew that the outrage would be huge, and tried to use her child, AGAIN, to further her own political interests. But, as soon as her idol and hero used the word, MULTIPLE TIMES, in a single show, her response suddenly becomes the one we are reading and hearing about now.

        I want you to be honest... well, do your best anyway. Are you at least willing to agree that her current position has changed dramatically from her initial response to Emanuel's use of the word? The one I sited above.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (February 07, 2010 10:57 pm ET)
          1 11
          You miss the point. Palin finds the use of the term 'retard/retarded' offensive when it is used in 'name-calling.'
          Rush wasn't name-calling - Emanuel was. Rush was using Emanuel's language against him. He was using the term to illustrate the kind of people we presently have setting policy in the US - namely Rahm Emanuel and his boss, Barack Obama. These people have no problem calling people retards - their insolent, arrogant, condescension would be truly politically suicidal had the press any objectivity at all.
          But not to worry. MMFA and the press will try to vilify Rush for quoting Emanuel.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Johaely (February 07, 2010 11:13 pm ET)
            1  
            And somehow when "Conservatives" brag about how they are real americans, how liberals are elitist sheep or lemmings, they suddenly are the model of humility.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (February 07, 2010 11:23 pm ET)
            7 1
            Rush wasn't name-calling - Emanuel was. Rush was using Emanuel's language against him.

            No he wasn't, liar. He even made reference to Emanuel's apology to the Special Olympics people as a "Retard Summit"--using the r-word, therefore, to describe the people Emanuel was apeaking to. In other words, Rush was indeed calling intellectually-impaired people r34567s, but in your book as well as Soulless Sarah's, insulting the developmentally disabled IOKIYAR...
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Johaely (February 07, 2010 11:11 pm ET)
        2  
        Satire is just Rush's excuse to et away with everything. I bet that if he openly said N****r on the air he'll just come around to say "it was satire" or "X liberal said it first". He would never face the consecuence of his actions.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by SMTDL (February 08, 2010 11:34 am ET)
        4  
        Do you think Rush meant it when he said liberals are Retards and Kooks and there would be a Retard summit?How is it satire when you are using the offending word over and over..It would be consistent with the name-calling he does with anybody he disagrees with every day anyway.If Sarah Palin doesn't like name calling, why does she do it all the time;when talking about the media,the President,the McCain Campaign people..in short anybody that disagrees with her?Beck,Limbaugh,Hannity,O'Reilly,etc call people they disagree with names everyday(e.g.Tiller the Baby Killer,Obama the Messiah) and she just loves them.How this hypocrisy gets sugar coated by apologists all the time is very disappointing.The stuff said by Tancredo,Farah,Palin at the Tea Party Convention says alot about our country.Negative,bigoted,racist comments were rampant but these people have the media drooling over them.If a group of minorities (Blacks and/or Hispanics) were having rallies with anti-government signs,racist signs against white people,effigy hangings,guns,talk of revolution,talk of watering the tree of liberty with blood of tyrants,talk of sedition and secession etc..they would not get the same treatment or media attention.A minority group would have been ridiculed ,mocked and probably arrested in some places around the country!!!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by theocracy (February 08, 2010 12:13 pm ET)
        3  
        Amplifying what bewildered says below, there are two (at least) distinct differences-- Emanuel referred not to any persons, but a strategy, as "effing r-tarded". It's like me saying something like "the above post is gibberingly idiotic" and having you reply that I called you a gibbering idiot. Actually that is probably closer than Emanuel ever came to calling someone a r-tard (probably truer, too). Second, he said it in August, and it was known in August, yet it's only become a talking point recently. It's a manufactured controversy as a smokescreen. Palin is probably the most craven politician of our era, and that's saying a lot.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bewildered (February 07, 2010 10:47 pm ET)
      6  
      First of all, we should be clear about the misinformation. I can't seem to track down the exact quote from Rahm Emanuel but he didn't refer to any person as being retarded, he was talking about their plan or ideas as being retarded which is quite different.

      I'm mentioning this because Palin is again stretching the truth and using her media appearances to say otherwise. Palin suggests the Rahm has called "a group of people whom he did not agree with" the forbidden 'R' expletive.

      Secondly, if Palin can't be even-handed on such an obvious comparison when using such language then she needs to stop throwing stones.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (February 07, 2010 11:28 pm ET)
        5  
        Secondly, if Palin can't be even-handed on such an obvious comparison when using such language then she needs to stop throwing stones.

        Look, it's not about any alleged insult to her DD son, otherwise she would have held Rush to at least a similar standard to that which she held Emanuel instead of letting Rush pour out "the r-word" in a gushing profusion (including one reference which definitely and deliberately refers to the DD population--"The Retard Summit") and openly defending it. It's all about using her children to score cheap political points against Democrats. In other words, child abuse. And yes, I am saying it right here--Sarah Palin is a child abuser...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Anthony (February 08, 2010 8:55 am ET)
      3  
      SO , if Others continue to use the word retard and add to it, that it is all "satirical", its all OK?
      COOL! Limbaugh, Palin, Beck and the tea party are RETARDED clowns! * ACHTUNG SATIRE***

      Their blatant hypocrisy will consequently become their political coffin. No one shouldn't mind that at all.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rlasker3 (February 08, 2010 9:33 am ET)
      3  
      What struck me the most was that Palin compared using the word "retard" to using the "N" word. So, I wonder if Palin finds it ok to used the "N" word as long as you are being satirical?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by everettbme (February 08, 2010 11:17 am ET)
      3  
      Palin latest to bend over and kiss the ring of GOP leader Limbaugh
      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnjana3627 (February 08, 2010 12:10 pm ET)
      3  
      On the quest to power there are no limits to how far one will go when it comes to the art of "Sucking Up" to those who can destroy you. (Or hiking up one's skirt). "And you will know them by their striped panties ...and the company they keep?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (February 08, 2010 2:14 pm ET)
      2  
      This woman is a joke.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by skycatcher (February 08, 2010 3:02 pm ET)
      2 1
      The other day I suggested that we didn't have enough information to form a belief about Palin's response to Rush. For that, I apologize to all of you; you were correct and I was wrong.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.